Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Journal of the Neurological Sciences ; 429:1, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1536851
2.
Frontiers in Public Health ; 9:637540, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1209194

ABSTRACT

Lockdown measures were initiated in Italy on March 9th after the start of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic to flatten the epidemic curve. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of restrictive measures in the Apulia Region, southern Italy, on air quality from March to April 2020. We applied a dual-track approach. We assessed citizen mobility and vehicle traffic with mobility network data and information obtained from satellite tracking, and we evaluated and compared pollutant concentration data as measured by monitoring stations maintained by the Regional Agency for Environmental Protection and Prevention of Apulia (ARPA). The results showed a decrease in the weekly mean NO<sub>2</sub> concentration recorded by urban traffic stations during the lockdown period. In particular, in the city of Bari, the average NO<sub>2</sub> concentration decreased from 62.2 mug/m<sup>3</sup> in March 2019 to 48.2 mug/m<sup>3</sup> in March 2020. Regarding PM10 levels, the average concentrations at the individual traffic stations showed no particular variation compared to those in the same months of the previous year, except for Bari-Caldarola Station in March 2019/2020 (p-value < 0.001) and in April 2019/2020 (p-value = 0.04). In particular the average in March 2019 was ~26.9 mug/m<sup>3</sup>, while that in March 2020 was ~22.9 mug/m<sup>3</sup>. For April, the average concentration of PM10 in 2019 was 27.9 mug/m<sup>3</sup>, while in 2020, the average was ~22.4 mug/m<sup>3</sup>. This can be explained by the fact that PM10 levels are influenced by multiple variables such as weather and climate conditions and desert dust advections.

3.
Ann Ig ; 33(6): 615-627, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1168080

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) made imperative the use of protective devices as a source control tool. As there is no definite antiviral treatment and effective vaccine, the only efficient means of protecting and mitigating infectious contagion has been the use of personal protective equipment, especially by healthcare workers. However, masks affect the humidification process of inhaled air, possibly leading to a basal inflammatory state of the upper airways. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-center observational study conducted at the University Hospital of Catania from April 1, 2020, to June 31, 2020. METHODS: We analyzed the role of protective masks on the elimination of upper airways complaints in healthcare workers of the University Hospital of Catania. We evaluated 277 subjects through a self-administered 17 item questionnaire based on respiratory, work performance and health-related quality of life domains. RESULTS: A higher prevalence of nasal and ocular symptoms, perceived reduced work performance, difficulty in concentrating, and sleep disorders were found. After two weeks adhering to a list of good practices that we recommended, significant reversibility of the symptoms investigated and work performance enhancement were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical complaints related to personal protective equipment, effective amelioration through usage rules is easily obtained. Given the essential use of protective masks, healthcare workers have to adhere to appropriate work and safety prevention rules.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Masks/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Quality of Life , Work Performance , Adult , COVID-19/transmission , Eye Diseases/etiology , Eye Diseases/prevention & control , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Lung Diseases/etiology , Lung Diseases/prevention & control , Male , Masks/standards , Middle Aged , Nose Diseases/etiology , Nose Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal ; 15(42):175-181, 2020.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-914397

ABSTRACT

In the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic, companies and institutions all over the world are trying to find the best ways to reorganize their activity, minimizing the contagion risk among their employees, so as to protect their health and prevent internal SARS-COV-2 outbreaks. The recent development of new communication technologies, such as smartphones and tablets, has paved the way for the development and implementation of different applications. Starting with the above issues, in this study, we wanted to investigate the efficacy of iAudiometry application developed by our research team for the detection of deficits in the auditory system. Furthermore, we analyzed the precision in detecting ambient Sound Pressure Levels between 3 different types of headphones. To this aim we divided the study and development process into four main phases: the feasibility study;the development of a signal generation algorithm, calibration and evaluation of the ambient Sound Pressure Level (SPL) on different types of headphones, and;a comparative study between conventional audiometry and an app with related headphones. Finally, this study allowed us to differentiate the headphones tested into 3 different types: headphones suitable for professional screening;Bluetooth headphones suitable for professional screening, and;headphones with slight but statistically significant differences, not suitable for professional screening. Our App is able to easily reproduce a reliable audiometric screening, limiting the contact between patient and examiner. © EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal 2020.

5.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 24(14): 7889-7904, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-693438

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In late December 2019 in Wuhan (China), Health Commission reported a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology, subsequently isolated and named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus 2 (CoV-2). In this review, the main transmission routes and causes of mortality associated with COVID-19 were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review was carried out to recognize relevant research available until 10 April 2020. RESULTS: The main transmission routes of COVID-19 have been the following: animal to human and human-to-human pathways, namely: respiratory transmission; oro-fecal transmission; air, surface-human transmission. Transmission from asymptomatic persons, healthcare transmission, and interfamily transmission have been well documented. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 possesses powerful pathogenicity and transmissibility. It is presumed to spread primarily via respiratory droplets and close contact. The most probable transmission pathway is definitely the inter-human one. Asymptomatic patients seem to play a crucial role in spreading the infection. Because of COVID-19 infection pandemic potential, careful surveillance is essential to monitor its future host adaptation, viral evolution, infectivity, transmissibility, and pathogenicity in order to gain an effective vaccine and flock immunity and reduce mortality as soon and as much as it is possible.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Animals , Asymptomatic Diseases , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Feces/virology , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/pathology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Sputum/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL